Published with permission, method and definitions.
What gets published here, and in what shape, is a policy statement. The current list follows it.
Published with permission and method
The policy, stated openly.
Only real clients, with written permission. Every study discloses its method: the comparison window, the dimensions held fixed, and the metric definitions used. Uplift numbers arrive with the baseline they were measured against, or they do not arrive. We do not publish anonymized composites, and we do not quote numbers a client has not approved.
Context, challenge, setup, results.
Context
App category, geographies, formats in use and the starting setup. Enough to judge similarity to yours.
Challenge
The problem in the operator's words, not a marketing paraphrase of it.
Setup
What changed: placements, formats, mediation structure, floors. The reproducible part.
Results
Metrics with definitions and measurement windows, against the stated baseline. Every number defined, none floating.
Empty, on the record.
There are no case studies published yet. This section stays empty until one exists that meets the policy above, rather than being padded with anonymized approximations. The guides and the transparency artifacts are the evidence available today, and they can all be checked without trusting this page.
How to become a published study.
Any integrated publisher can nominate an app. Participation requires written permission to publish, agreement on the metrics and their definitions, and a comparison window both sides accept. The study is drafted with you, reviewed by you, and published with your approval on the final text. Start the conversation through the publisher contact route with the subject line "case study".
The list stays honest until it is real.
Until studies publish, judge the network on what can be verified: the public files and the enforcement policy.
Real clients only · permission required · methods disclosed